Skip to content
Juris 340B Solutions
Flagship resource

State 340B Law Tracker

A growing number of states have passed laws addressing 340B contract pharmacy access or duplicate discounts. For organizations operating across state lines, tracking them by hand isn’t realistic. This tracker keeps all 50 states in one place.

  • Search all 50 states
  • Counsel review before publication
  • Updated monthly
Why it exists

State law now moves faster than any single team can track.

State laws differ in what they protect, who enforces them and what penalties apply. For multi-state systems, contract pharmacy and Medicaid billing rules can diverge by site.

This tracker summarizes each state’s status in plain English so operations, compliance and finance teams know where to look more closely and when to involve legal counsel.

How to read the tracker

What we track for each state

  • Status

    Enacted, pending, not introduced or subject to litigation, once researched and reviewed.

  • Scope

    What a law covers, such as manufacturer restrictions, payer practices or claims-data requirements.

  • Effective date

    When the law took or takes effect, where applicable.

  • Enforcement and penalties

    The enforcing agency and stated penalties, when verified.

  • Source and review date

    A link to the bill or statute and the date the entry was last reviewed.

Try it

Search by state.

All 50 states are listed below. Every status remains Pending research until the state research is sourced and reviewed by counsel.

AlabamaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
AlaskaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
ArizonaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
ArkansasSource pending · Review pendingPending research
CaliforniaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
ColoradoSource pending · Review pendingPending research
ConnecticutSource pending · Review pendingPending research
DelawareSource pending · Review pendingPending research
FloridaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
GeorgiaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
HawaiiSource pending · Review pendingPending research
IdahoSource pending · Review pendingPending research
IllinoisSource pending · Review pendingPending research
IndianaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
IowaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
KansasSource pending · Review pendingPending research
KentuckySource pending · Review pendingPending research
LouisianaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
MaineSource pending · Review pendingPending research
MarylandSource pending · Review pendingPending research
MassachusettsSource pending · Review pendingPending research
MichiganSource pending · Review pendingPending research
MinnesotaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
MississippiSource pending · Review pendingPending research
MissouriSource pending · Review pendingPending research
MontanaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
NebraskaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
NevadaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
New HampshireSource pending · Review pendingPending research
New JerseySource pending · Review pendingPending research
New MexicoSource pending · Review pendingPending research
New YorkSource pending · Review pendingPending research
North CarolinaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
North DakotaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
OhioSource pending · Review pendingPending research
OklahomaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
OregonSource pending · Review pendingPending research
PennsylvaniaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
Rhode IslandSource pending · Review pendingPending research
South CarolinaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
South DakotaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
TennesseeSource pending · Review pendingPending research
TexasSource pending · Review pendingPending research
UtahSource pending · Review pendingPending research
VermontSource pending · Review pendingPending research
VirginiaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
WashingtonSource pending · Review pendingPending research
West VirginiaSource pending · Review pendingPending research
WisconsinSource pending · Review pendingPending research
WyomingSource pending · Review pendingPending research

All states remain Pending research until entries are sourced and reviewed by counsel. Published entries will include a source and last-reviewed date. This is general information, not legal advice, and may not reflect recent amendments or court decisions.

Statuses remain Pending research until entries are sourced and reviewed by counsel. This tracker is not legal advice; consult qualified counsel.

Operating in more than one state?

Align your program state by state.

We help multi-state health systems map each site and contract pharmacy to applicable state rules, update policies and Medicaid billing workflows, and monitor changes. Legal interpretation remains with your counsel; we handle operational alignment.

State 340B law FAQs

Questions about state 340B laws

Still have a question? Talk to a consultant
QUESTION 01

What is a state 340B contract pharmacy law?

It is a state law that may restrict manufacturers from limiting 340B pricing or deliveries to contract pharmacies serving covered entities. Terms and enforcement vary by state.

QUESTION 02

Which state passed the first 340B contract pharmacy law?

Arkansas enacted the first state 340B contract pharmacy protection law in 2021. Verify current state law and legal status with qualified counsel.

QUESTION 03

Does a state 340B law change federal 340B requirements?

No. Covered entities must still meet HRSA program requirements. State laws may add state-level protections or obligations.

01 / 03
Book a Free Consultation